Policy on co workers dating speed dating events in the midlands
The employer can act on its suspicions and circumstantial evidence.” This is basically the same as if your employer suspected you of violating any other policy (or even doing something they didn’t like, whether prohibited by a policy or not): If, for instance, your employer suspected you of being rude to clients or watching too much You Tube at your desk, they wouldn’t need to present you with evidence. In this case, though, Bryan goes on to say that they’d still be wise to only act if they have solid evidence: “Acting on flimsy suspicions would only serve to alienate employees, lower morale because they fear ‘big brother’ is prying into their personal lives, and risk losing good and loyal employees without a good reason.
Throw in the fact that they have a pattern of firing the women in these couples but not the men, and there’s something pretty disturbing there.
I’d say that you have to decide if you want to work for a company that operates that way.
He says: “As for reasonable suspicion, the law does not impose any sort of standard that the employer must meet before taking action.
That is to say, the employer does not need admissions from the employees, or explicit emails, or video evidence.
Two of my coworkers have warned me to be careful, as there have just been rumors of people in the past possibly having relations and the woman was always the one to be terminated.
It is indeed legal to prohibit dating between coworkers (with a few exceptions, such as in California, where courts have ruled that the state constitution provides broader privacy protection in employment matters).